Resource assessment
Solar irradiance, wind profiles, hybrid resource modeling, long-term data quality, degradation assumptions.
Structuring renewable energy projects — solar, wind, storage, and hybrid systems — under a unified analytical framework.
Renewable energy projects carry their own risk profile: resource variability rather than subsurface uncertainty, technology selection, grid interconnection, long-term offtake.
Solar irradiance, wind profiles, hybrid resource modeling, long-term data quality, degradation assumptions.
Technology selection, supplier reliability, construction complexity, commissioning path, operating profile.
PPA or merchant exposure, counterparty credit, revenue stacking (capacity, energy, ancillary, environmental credits).
Interconnection path, grid congestion, policy support structure, environmental permitting, local stakeholder considerations.
Renewable projects often have cleaner stage progression than E&P, but interconnection risk can reshape weighting significantly.
| Stage | Dimensions carrying most weight |
|---|---|
| Stage 1–2 | Resource, Technology selection, Regulatory pathway |
| Stage 3–4 | Financial structure, PPA quality, Interconnection certainty |
| Stage 5–6 | Execution discipline, Technology performance, Grid connection |
| Stage 7 | Operating performance, Market exposure, Degradation tracking |
Typical focus areas in renewables engagements:
Initial conversations cover scope, specific sector characteristics, and data availability.
Contact TCA